Qualitative content analysis · model-assisted coding

Yaşar İtiraf as public anonymous social practice

Read first

How to read this explorer

This is a close-reading tool for a sampled Yaşar İtiraf corpus. Click a theme or subtheme, then use the charts and examples to see how that slice behaves over time. The charts compare composition inside the sample, not the total volume of the Instagram account.

ThemesBroad interpretive families such as academic bureaucracy, romance, peer visibility, or civic care.
SubthemesSmaller recurring situations inside a family, useful for close reading and evidence checks.
ConfidenceHow strongly the model-assisted code fits the post. Low-confidence rows stay visible in the review queue.
Publicness/anonymityWhether the post explicitly asks for anonymity, performs public exposure, or reads as ordinary open posting.

What you are seeing now

Current view

Step 1

Theme families

Start here if you want the big picture. Each card shows the total size of a family, how many rows remain under your filters, and the subthemes that make up that family. Click a card to filter the whole page.

Step 2

Subthemes

Use subthemes for closer interpretation. These cards make it easier to move from a broad family to concrete situations, then inspect the evidence posts below.

Step 3

When this slice appears

Blue bars show the whole sample for that bucket; green overlay shows the currently filtered slice. Read them as share/composition signals, not raw account activity.

Monthly composition

Yearly trend

Academic season profile

Crosswalk

Older categories and coarse registers

This connects the qualitative codes back to the earlier project categories. Use it to see whether a theme is mostly information logistics, social connection, commerce, expression/transgression, or civic/other activity.

Original categories

Coarse registers

Boundary cases

Uncertainty and review queue

These are rows with an explicit review flag or confidence below 65%. They are not hidden failures; they are the places where a human reader should adjudicate the code, evidence phrase, or anonymity/publicness claim.

Evidence

Representative posts

Methods and caveats

What this can and cannot prove